Difference: CemProtocSPA (1 vs. 11)

Revision 1126 Oct 2009 - Main.KdDerr

 
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
Return to Cryo EM web page at http://www.nysbc.org/facilities/CEM

Principles & Protocols



Principles - Single Particle Analysis

Changed:
<
<

Jump to Protocol

>
>

Jump to Protocol

 

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.


Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 1013 Oct 2009 - Main.KdDerr

 
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
Changed:
<
<
>
>
Return to Cryo EM web page at http://www.nysbc.org/facilities/CEM
 

Principles & Protocols



Added:
>
>

Principles - Single Particle Analysis

Jump to Protocol

 
Deleted:
<
<

Single Particle Analysis

 

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Deleted:
<
<
Rewrite.Verbatim
 In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.


Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 920 Aug 2009 - Main.KdDerr

 
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
Principles & Protocols
>
>

Principles & Protocols

 
Deleted:
<
<
Interested in EM? Using CEMfac? Principles & Protocols CEMfac Equipment Seminars & Courses
CEMfac Home? CEM Introduction Microscope Schedule NYSBC Directory Cryo-EM public website
 

Single Particle Analysis

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Rewrite.Verbatim In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.


Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 810 Aug 2009 - Main.BillRice

 
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
Deleted:
<
<
NYSBC|Cryo-EM P&P: Single particle analysis
 
Added:
>
>
 
Principles & Protocols
Interested in EM? Using CEMfac? Principles & Protocols CEMfac Equipment Seminars & Courses
CEMfac Home? CEM Introduction Microscope Schedule NYSBC Directory Cryo-EM public website

Deleted:
<
<
 

Single Particle Analysis

Deleted:
<
<
 

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Rewrite.Verbatim In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.


Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 710 Aug 2009 - Main.BillRice

 
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
NYSBC|Cryo-EM P&P: Single particle analysis


Principles & Protocols
Interested in EM? Using CEMfac? Principles & Protocols CEMfac Equipment Seminars & Courses
CEMfac Home? CEM Introduction Microscope Schedule NYSBC Directory Cryo-EM public website

Changed:
<
<
Single Particle Analysis
>
>

Single Particle Analysis

Deleted:
<
<

Principles
Background
Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Protocols
Protocols


 
Deleted:
<
<
Principles
Background

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images
Rewrite.Verbatim
In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by
DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.
back to top

 
Changed:
<
<
Protocols
Protocols

back to top

>
>

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Rewrite.Verbatim In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

Added:
>
>
The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.

 
Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 612 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 5 is unreadable
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="CemProtoc"
NYSBC|Cryo-EM P&P: Single particle analysis


Principles & Protocols
Interested in EM? Using CEMfac? Principles & Protocols CEMfac Equipment Seminars & Courses
CEMfac Home? CEM Introduction Microscope Schedule NYSBC Directory Cryo-EM public website

Single Particle Analysis

Principles
Background
Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images

Protocols
Protocols


Principles
Background

Three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional images
Rewrite.Verbatim
In a frozen-hydrated sample of homogeneous, identical particles, each particle is embedded within the vitreous ice layer in a different orientation. The image that is formed of such a layer of particles in a micrograph, recorded on photographic film or a charged-couple device (CCD), is a two-dimensional projection of each particle (Figure 1). The challenge is thus to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the particle from different two-dimensional projections. The mathematical theory underlying three- dimensional reconstruction, which goes back to Radon (55), was first put into practice by
DeRosier and Klug (20), who reconstructed a bacteriophage tail from electron micrographs. However, unlike the reconstruction of the highly ordered, helical bacteriophage tail, which only requires a single view, the reconstruction of a totally asymmetric particle requires that a large number of views are available, and that their relative orientation are known with high accuracy.

For a homogeneous sample, the spatial relationship of the particles in the vitreous ice layer can be described mathematically by a series of rigid-body translations and rotations of a single object. Thus, if the angular distribution of the particles is sufficiently uniform, i.e., if particles are present in orientations that sample a large part of the angular space, then a set of micrographs of the specimen, each showing projections of hundreds of particles, contains all the information necessary to reconstruct the particle in three dimensions.

The problem of determining the relative orientation among all projections is challenging because of the low SNR of the data. If no prior information about the structure of the particle is known, two ab initio methods can be used for orientation determination: (i) In the ‘random-conical’ data collection method (69), which involves the use of an additional tilted view of the specimen, geometric relationships are established among a subset of particles that face the grid in the same orientation. (ii) In the ‘method of common lines’ (34, 83), particle images are first classified, then class averages representing different views of the particle are related to one another following the common lines principle first formulated by Crowther (18). The latter method cannot establish the handedness, however, and requires an extra tilt for this purpose. From a set of projections whose angles have been determined by either one of these ab initio methods, a coarse reconstruction can then be computed, which is inaccurate yet contains important shape information allowing higher resolution and accuracy to be achieved through a succession of iterative steps, known as angular refinement.

In the refinement, the first, coarse reconstruction serves as an initial reference structure from which two-dimensional projections are computed, which are then compared to the experimental projections, yielding refined angles. With those angles, a new reconstruction is obtained, which is then used as reference in the next cycle, etc. Refinement continues until no improvement in the reconstructed three-dimensional model is observed, or the orientation angles have stabilized (see (27, 54, 84) for more detailed reviews on cryo-EM). Currently, resolutions in the range between 10 and 13 Å are routinely obtained, where detailed features of proteins and RNA are observed at the level of protein domains or RNA backbone. Resolutions in the range up to 7 Å, where structural motifs such as alpha-helices start to be discernable (see (8)), still require a large effort. Typically, more than 100,000 particle projections are required to meet this goal. Still larger numbers are needed – an estimated 1,000,000 for the ribosome – to approach 3 Å resolution. However, while the achievement of atomic resolution still awaits improvements in several instrumental and data processing aspects, existing moderate-resolution cryo-EM density maps of a molecular assembly can already be interpreted at the atomic level if X-ray or NMR structures of its components are known. The remainder of this chapter will elaborate on the way these “hybrid” methods of analysis can be put to use.
back to top

Protocols
Protocols

back to top


Public website mirror

-- KakoliMitra - 11 Feb 2009

Revision 512 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 4 is unreadable
>
>
Revision 5 is unreadable

Revision 412 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 3 is unreadable
>
>
Revision 4 is unreadable

Revision 312 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 2 is unreadable
>
>
Revision 3 is unreadable

Revision 212 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 1 is unreadable
>
>
Revision 2 is unreadable

Revision 111 Feb 2009 - Main.KakoliMitra

Changed:
<
<
Revision 1 is unreadable
>
>
Revision 1 is unreadable
 
Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this intranet, Send feedback