
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFTIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
| ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| -- DavidCowburn - 29 Jun 2005 | ||||||||
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFTIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Contents
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFTIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
| |||||||
| > > | Contents
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFTIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
| |||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
Contents
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFTIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution. | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| -- DavidCowburn - 29 Jun 2005 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC | |||||||
| > > | Intellectual Property issues at NYSBC DRAFT | |||||||
IP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staff | ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | When there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('conortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work. | |||||||
| > > | When there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('consortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work. | |||||||
Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < |
| |||||||
| > > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
| Changed: | ||||||||
| < < | subsub level topic | |||||||
| > > | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Intellectual Property issues at NYSBCIP for activities using the resoucesNormally, when there is no NYSBC staff intellectual contribution, all activities of the Member Institutions are governed by the Institution's rules, and any resulting IP is entirely the property of the Member Institution.IP for activities using NYSBC staffWhen there is an intellectual contribution from NYSBC staff, then there is the expectation that interinstitutional arrangements will be made for resulting IP between the Member Institution and NYSBC. This is formally recognized in, e.g., subcontract arrangements ('conortium agreements') when NYSBC received subcontracts from ongoing grants at a Member Institutions for specific work.Exception for IP-retaining consulting workIn order to enhance the availability of NYSBC resources to faculty at Member Institutions who have a need for occassional, but substantial, use of NYSBC staff, and well as resources, the faculty member may negotiate a contract with NYSBC for use of NYSBC staff as retained consultant(s) with IP being retained wholly by the faculty Member Institution.
subsub level topic
|